Past Crypto Fundraising: The Complete Archive of Closed Private and Public Funding Rounds
CoinLaunch holds the most complete archive of closed crypto funding rounds anywhere, with every entry scored, sourced, and reconciled against the original announcement. This is where you answer the questions a live feed cannot: what did comparable projects genuinely raise, at what valuation, from which backers, and what happened to the token afterward. Each closed record keeps its final amount, round type, lead and participating investors, valuation, vesting terms, and listing outcome. Founders benchmark their own raise against it, analysts track how sector valuations have moved across quarters, and backers use it to check an investor's real record rather than the one on the deck. Filter the crypto fundraising database by chain, sector, year, round type, or investor to build whatever comparison set the question needs.
Anoma - Undisclosed Round 2
- CyberConnect ICO Round on Coinlist
Mushe - 1st ICO Round
RedStone Oracles Protocol - Angel Round
Story Protocol - Seed Round
Asymmetry Finance - Seed Round
STRATO (BlockApps) - Series A Round
XHYPE - Private Sale Round
Tea-Fi - Strategic Round
zkLink - Private Funding Round
Sui - Launchpool Round on Binance
Fanton - Pre-Seed Round
Nomina (prev. Omni Network) - Series A Funding RoundDon't Miss Any of Cryptocurrency Crowdfunding History With CoinLaunch
Most crypto funding news is written once and never corrected. Target raises get reported as final figures, rounds quietly shrink between announcement and close, and the number that ends up in every subsequent article is the one from the press release. This archive records the closing figure rather than the headline, and keeps the revision history attached so you can see how a round actually landed. That correction layer is what separates an archive from a clippings file, and it is the reason these numbers hold up in a memo. Where a figure was revised, the original and the correction both remain visible, along with the source that prompted the change.
Coverage runs across every round type in the crypto crowdfunding ladder, so a single project can be traced from its first seed check through to listing on one timeline. Landmark deals anchor the comparison sets, including Kalshi's $1B private round, which reset valuation expectations across prediction markets. Projects now trading publicly, among them Kalshi and Polymarket, carry their complete history on their project pages. Rounds that ran through Republic, Echo, or Legion link back to the launchpad directory with their outcomes attached, which makes each venue's record auditable rather than asserted.
This is the historical slice of the database. Rounds accepting commitments now sit on the active fundraising page, and rounds announced but not yet open are on the upcoming rounds page. For pre-listing allocations specifically, the private rounds archive records closed deals with their discount-to-listing preserved. Historical context also runs through the past events archive, where completed hackathons, grants, and conferences map onto the raises that followed them.
How do I build a valuation comparison set?
Benchmarking is the archive's most common use, and it works best when the filter is narrow enough to be honest. A workable sequence:
- Filter by sector first, since valuation multiples differ sharply between infrastructure, DeFi, gaming, and consumer.
- Narrow to a single stage. Mixing a seed round into a Series B comparison set produces a range wide enough to justify anything.
- Constrain the date window to four quarters or fewer, because crypto valuations reprice faster than traditional venture.
- Exclude the outliers deliberately, then look at the median rather than the mean.
- Check each remaining round's source link before relying on the figure.
The output is a defensible range rather than a headline number. Every figure carries its source, so anything you put in front of an investment committee traces back to a filing or an announcement.
Which round types appear in the archive?
Closed records are organized along the ladder the market actually uses, and each rounds of funding label filters independently:
- Pre-seed and seed, typically first institutional capital ahead of a working product.
- Series A, B, and C, priced against traction and revenue rather than narrative.
- Strategic rounds from exchanges, market makers, and ecosystem funds, where distribution matters as much as capital.
- Private sales, discounted token allocations closed before listing.
- Public sales, IDOs, and launchpad rounds, the smallest tickets and the widest participation.
Many projects ran several of these in parallel, so the archive records them as separate entries on a shared timeline rather than collapsing them into a single figure. That distinction matters when a headline raise turns out to be three rounds added together.
How do I check an investor's real track record?
Fund marketing tends to foreground a handful of winners. The archive lets you pull the complete list instead, which is a different picture in most cases. Pull every closed round a fund participated in, then read:
- How many of those projects still have active development today.
- How token prices behaved through the unlock schedule the fund agreed to.
- Whether the fund led or merely joined, since lead participation carries far more signal.
- Whether they concentrated in one sector or cycle, which tells you how much of the record is skill and how much is timing.
This is the cheapest diligence available on the sell side of a pitch. A lead investor's name is often used as a quality signal, and the archive is where you find out whether that signal has held up.
What happened to projects that raised in past crypto funding rounds?
Outcomes vary far more than fundraising coverage implies, and the archive is deliberately unflattering about it. Roughly 50% of crypto projects launched since 2014 are now considered defunct according to CoinGecko research, and funded projects track that base rate closely. Every closed entry carries a current status tag:
- Listed and active: token trading, development ongoing.
- Listed and dormant: token trading, development stalled.
- Pre-listing: round closed, TGE still pending.
- Defunct: project wound down or abandoned.
Reading the failures is worth more than reading the winners. The patterns that precede a dormant tag, anonymous teams with no prior shipping record, insider-weighted vesting, and unverifiable round leads, are visible in the data well before they became obvious in the market.
What do the Active and Upcoming views add?
The fundraising database is split into three views, each built for a different job:
- Upcoming: announced rounds not yet open. Built for preparation.
- Active: rounds accepting commitments right now. Built for execution.
- Past (this page): closed rounds with final terms and outcomes. Built for benchmarking.
Records persist across all three rather than being re-keyed at each transition, which is why a round's announced terms and its closing terms can be compared directly here.